A smaller house is a greener house, plain and simple–even if it doesn’t have EnergyStar this and EnergyStar that–even if it doesn’t have foam insulation, solar panels or a tankless hot water heater. It’s greener because it’s carbon footprint is smaller. A small house in a walkable neighborhood is even greener.
I have an adorable 1931 completely remodeled home listed for sale in the Clarendon neighborhood of Arlington, VA. Clarendon is one of the most “sought after” neighborhoods in the city because of it’s proximity to shopping, metro, restaurants, night life, etc. Because of it’s desirability, it’s a fairly pricy neighborhood. The house has just under 1200 square feet–so not large. But it has been opened up so that there’s a wonderful flow. It has large windows and amazing light. The landscaped yard is lovely and low maintenance. And the fact that this small house was not knocked down to build a larger house makes it greener still.
Part of the neighborhood has a dense concentration of high rise condominiums. A condo with comparable square footage could run nearly $600,000 with a condo fee of over $400 per month. Buildings use 40% of all of the energy used with high rise buildings using the majority of that. Most high rise condo buildings are not very energy efficient. So their carbon footprint makes a giant sucking sound.
Why I wonder, would someone be okay living in a high rise condo paying nearly $600,000 for 1100-1200 square feet and a $400 a month condo fee but feel that a 1200 square foot house with no condo fee is too small. Now I have nothing against condos and I understand that condo living fits a certain lifestyle. But I do wonder if there is also the perception that a house has to be bigger than a condo or apartment? If so, that perception is changing according to all recent studies. The small home movement is growing.
When I was a child, which was admittedly a long time ago, the first home my parents bought had three bedrooms, one bath, a living room, dining room, kitchen and a big backyard with an apple and walnut tree. There were four kids and I don’t ever remember thinking our house was too small. I do remember yelling at my siblings to hurry up in the bathroom and I remember the nightly bath schedule. By the time I was 13 we had moved to a house that had 4 bedrooms, one and a half baths and a den. We thought we were living in the lap of luxury!
For many decades most families lived in homes about the size of the homes I grew up in. Now there is a clearly defined trend towards smaller homes. The changing demographics of the average home buyer shows that single women made up 21 percent of the homebuyers in 2009. These women are professional with busy schedules and no time for the maintenance of a larger home.
The National Association of Homebuilders is reporting that the average size of new homes has been declining for the last four or five years and young people and empty nesters are flocking to smaller homes. And the Wall Street Journal Development Blog reported just this month:
Gen Y housing preferences are the subject of at least two panels at this week’s convention. A key finding: They want to walk everywhere. Surveys show that 13% carpool to work, while 7% walk, said Melina Duggal, a principal with Orlando-based real estate adviser RCLCO. A whopping 88% want to be in an urban setting, but since cities themselves can be so expensive, places with shopping, dining and transit such as Bethesda and Arlington in the Washington suburbs will do just fine.
“One-third are willing to pay for the ability to walk,” Ms. Duggal said. “They don’t want to be in a cookie-cutter type of development. …The suburbs will need to evolve to be attractive to Gen Y.”
So my little beauty of a listing is right in line with the national trend. Small is beautiful! Have a look.
My purpose is to serve my clients and advocate for their highest and best good, so they attain their real estate goals.